Do you feel obligated to be generous and compassionate?

by Pace on February 9th, 2009 @ 1:32 pm in How To Be Awesome
Tags:

I was talking with a new friend online a couple of days ago, and she echoed a sentiment that I’ve felt many times myself. She said (paraphrased):

“There’s a voice inside my head telling me that I ought to be compassionate, that I should be generous. When I try to hold healthy boundaries, this voice tells me to just give it all away, because that would be the good and nice thing to do.”

I have a similar voice in my head, too. It’s like an angel sitting on my shoulder, except it’s harmful instead of helpful. Because you know what?

The #1 block to compassion and generosity is obligation.

If you feel obligated to be compassionate or generous, then all your “compassion” or “generosity” won’t be true or clear. It will be tainted with guilt. Say that I do you a favor because I’d feel guilty for not being nice if I didn’t. Is that generosity? No! It’s guilterosity.

It’s like that time when a woman apologized to Kyeli because “Jesus told her to.” Kyeli didn’t perceive her apology as heartfelt because it seemed like she was doing it out of obligation instead of a true and clear desire to apologize. Hence, from Kyeli’s point of view, the apology was meaningless.

It’s the same with compassion. It’s the same with generosity.

Compassion is meaningless unless it’s heartfelt.

If you act “compassionately” because you’d feel guilty and feel like a bad person if you didn’t? That’s not compassion. That’s guiltassion! Look, it even has “ass” in it, because it’s an asinine thing to do. It also has “ion” in it, because it’s unbalanced. Electrically. Or something. Moving on.

Do you feel like you’d be a bad, selfish person if you didn’t act compassionately? Well, I believe that you’re not. I believe that you’re a human being, and human beings have self-interest and human beings also have compassion. Self-interest doesn’t have to be “selfishness” in the nasty sense of the word. It just means you’re concerned with your own well-being. Some people are wired to be concerned with their own well-being first and the well-being of others second. Some people are wired differently; for example a lot of moms place the well-being of their children above their own.

It’s okay to be who you are.

If you’re a compassionate person, be yourself. If you’re a selfish person, be yourself. If you’re a complex human being who doesn’t fit easily into categories, be yourself.

“But no one will like me if I stop acting nicely, generously, and compassionately!” you exclaim, frightened. Bullshit. I, for one, respect authenticity FAR more than guilterosity or guiltassion. I would vastly prefer that someone decline to do something nice for me (politely) than to do something “nice” for me out of guilt. Even if I couldn’t sense the guilt vibes, I would still prefer an honest no than a dishonest yes. Because that’s really what it is. It’s dishonesty. You’re acting based on how you feel you should act instead of how you want to act. And that’s just going to set up all sorts of dissonance and ick.

Still afraid to be yourself? You’re not alone. It’s scary. It’s scary to think that your friends might only like you because you do “nice” things for them instead of liking you for who you actually are, deep down inside. But if that’s the case, then FUCK YOUR FRIENDS. If they only like you for the favors you do for them, then they’re not really your friends at all. If you decide to be yourself, openly and authentically, warts and all, then you will find friends who respect, like, and love you as you truly are.

It feels like it’s not okay, doesn’t it? It feels like the sort of thing that you’re not allowed to do. So try this on for size.

You have my permission to not be compassionate.

Don’t want to help your brother with his move? Tell him no, and if he gives you the guilty eyes, tell him it’s okay, Pace said it was okay to not be compassionate.

Don’t want to donate to that charity? Tell them no. If they give you a hard time, tell them Pace said it was okay to not be generous.

There’s a video game I’m playing called Persona 4. Each of the characters has to fight their dark side, their shadow self — all the thoughts and feelings they have, but won’t admit to themselves. And yeah, there’s fighting, but the fighting just makes it stronger. Denying that it exists, saying “You’re not me!” is what makes it the strongest. And the only way to defeat it is to accept it as part of yourself. That’s when you awaken to your true power.

Real life is like Persona 4.


Are you ready to stop reading about how to be awesome and start living it? Our 52 Weeks to Awesome e-course is open for registration! With a commitment of just an hour per week, you can be living an awesome life in 52 baby steps. What better time to start than now?

13 Comments!

#1 Posted by Cricket on February 9th, 2009 1:58 pm | link

Man, and all this time I thought I was being a jerk, I was just holding healthy boundaries! Who knew!

#2 Posted by SmartyMcSmartyPants on February 9th, 2009 2:00 pm | link

I love it when you say “bullshit.” :)

#3 Posted by Michael on February 9th, 2009 2:18 pm | link

Just to throw a language translation at you, when a Christian says “Jesus told me to [do this good act that I don't want to do]…”

You should translate that to, “I don’t want to, but I have a standard for myself that I want to uphold. I want to be better than I am. So, I’m going to strive because I know it to be the right thing to do.”

#4 Posted by Joely Black on February 9th, 2009 3:34 pm | link

I just love this post! I feel better just reading it.

#5 Posted by Heidi Fischbach on February 9th, 2009 3:39 pm | link

Just a wink from “a new friend online” ;) Thanks for the post. Doing my best to stay open and honest and authentic — because yes, giving from a forced place sucks. And, likewise, there’s such a wanting to be openhearted and generous. Ahhhhh. I feel the paradox there. Thanks, Pacey ;)

#6 Posted by Heidi Fischbach on February 9th, 2009 5:09 pm | link

I mean, Pace. Ooops. And now I’ll leave before I wink again. Did I really wink that much up there? i’m really not a winker, or so I thought.

#7 Posted by JoVE on February 9th, 2009 6:11 pm | link

Absolutely! Honesty is a much better virtue in my mind. And when you are yourself and being compassionate and generous in an honest and authentic way, it feels so much better. Like you want to do more of it. Where as that guiltassion and guilterosity always feels like you’re being put upon and sooner or later you get resentful.

#8 Posted by Ellen Naylor on February 10th, 2009 2:46 am | link

I think a lot of this “ought to do” is what’s behind guilassion and guilterosity. I would rather live my life in the “want to do.” However, I have a hard time expressing compassion unless I mean it or saying thank-you when I don’t want to. I would rather stay quiet or change the subject or leave! But I have to admit I do get roped into stuff when it comes to my elderly parents. When this first started I was in the “ought to do” mode, and in the last 5 years, it’s shifted to the “want to do,” which is a good thing since they’re 90+ and they need us kids to help them out. I figure they put up with me as a teenager…oh don’t even go there, right?!

#9 Posted by Megan M. on February 10th, 2009 7:44 am | link

Look, it even has “ass” in it, because it’s an asinine thing to do. It also has “ion” in it, because it’s unbalanced. Electrically. Or something. Moving on.

ROFL!!! You’re awesome.

#10 Posted by Pace on February 10th, 2009 5:18 pm | link

@Cricket: And who knew you could blame it all on me! (;

@Michael: Hmm. That makes sense to me, but it still bugs me because it’s so disempowering. The feel of “I’m holding myself to a high ethical standard so I can be the kind of person I’d be proud to be” feels totally different from “I’m doing this because I’m obligated to by the entity to which I’ve outsourced my moral responsibility.”

@Ellen: Yes! The ought vs. want thing is something I’ve been working on for many years. It’s very insidious! Here’s a post I wrote about it if you’re curious as to some of my thoughts on the matter. http://www.alexshalman.com/2008/12/19/10-ways-to-improve-your-happiness-by-changing-your-vocabulary/

@Everyone else: YES! Thank you! (:

#11 Posted by Julia on February 11th, 2009 10:06 am | link

Thank you for validating my tendency to do only those good things for other people that I WANT to do anyway. :)

#12 Posted by bramblekite on March 9th, 2009 1:53 pm | link

“Hence, from Kyeli’s point of view, the apology was meaningless.”

I have pretty much given up apologizing, because of this sort of thing.

IMHO, it’s not up to the person being apologized to to decide whether an apology is ‘real’ or not.

It’s up to the person being apologized to to decide “do I accept the apology?” and “do I forgive the person?” not to judge the apology or the apologizer’s motives, sincerity, word choice, bla bla bla. If you think the person is untrustworthy or insincere, or apt to do the same damn hurtful thing again, then go ahead and disengage, but there’s no reason to be openly scornful of the apology or the person making it.

#13 Posted by Hugs, Transparency, Guiltassion, Hedonism, & Boundaries « The Living Poet on May 29th, 2009 7:17 pm | link

[...] 2. Do You Feel Obligated To Be Generous and Compassionate? [...]

Comment!

CommentLuv Enabled